Peer Review

Become a Reviewer

The Journal of Nutrition & Dietetics (JND) follows a rigorous double-anonymized peer-review process to ensure the scientific validity and credibility of published research. Peer review is essential to maintaining the journal's high standards and improving the quality of manuscripts submitted for publication.

Introduction

Peer reviewers are central to the integrity and quality of the Journal of Nutrition & Dietetics. JND depends on qualified experts who generously volunteer their time and expertise to evaluate submitted manuscripts. Reviewers help editors make informed decisions, guide authors toward stronger scholarship, and ultimately shape the body of knowledge in nutrition and dietetics.

Criteria

Ph.D. or equivalent in Nutrition, Dietetics, or related fields.
Published at least 10 peer-reviewed journal articles.
Experience in manuscript review and research methodologies.
Commitment to timely and constructive peer review.

Competencies

Subject matter expertise in Nutrition and Dietetics.
Ability to provide constructive and unbiased feedback.
Ethical integrity and commitment to confidentiality.
Strong analytical skills for assessing research methodology.

Roles & Responsibilities

Assess the scientific quality of the manuscript with their expert knowledge.
Prepare comprehensive and detailed review reports and remain responsive throughout the peer review process.
Uphold the highest standards of professionalism and ethics, avoiding personal, financial, or intellectual biases, focusing solely on the research quality and written presentation of the manuscript.
To preserve confidentiality throughout the review process and not disclose or use unpublished information or communicate the manuscript content without prior consent from the Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics Editorial Team.
Refrain from contacting the authors directly without the knowledge of the Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics Editorial Team.
Reviewers are requested to update their affiliation on their reviewer account to allow editors to identify potential conflicts of interest promptly.
Complete the review process by providing the reviewer's comments within 14 days. If you are unable to adhere to this timeline or need an extension, please promptly communicate with the editorial team.

Benefits of Being a Reviewer

Support and maintain the integrity of scientific literature in the realm of Nutrition Science.
Enhance your professional reputation through peer review involvement.
Chance to become a chairperson during the Annual Conference.
Receive a certificate for your contribution as a reviewer.
To enjoy 20% exclusive offers on Article Processing Charges when publishing with the Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics.

Invitation to Review

JND is committed to publishing high-quality scientific research. Each manuscript submitted to us undergoes a thorough review process conducted by two or three reviewers.

To ensure an efficient and effective review process, reviewers are requested to:

Respond promptly to review invitations based on their understanding and interest in the manuscript title and abstract.
Suggest alternative reviewers should they need to decline the invitation, ensuring that the manuscript still gets an expert perspective.
Request an extension, if necessary, to ensure a comprehensive review report.

Factors to consider before starting a review process:

The reviewers are expected to complete it within 14 days. Please communicate immediately with the editorial team if this deadline cannot be met.
Please inform the editorial team if there is any conflict of interest or other reasons that might impede an objective review.
The manuscript's content should not be shared without the editor's permission.
If you suspect misconduct, only discuss it with the editor.
Do you understand the journal's peer-review policy? More information can be found here.

Reviewers' Overall Recommendation

In addition to reviewers' comments on the manuscript, reviewers shall be expected to select an overall recommendation on the manuscript reviewers form.

Accept with minor revisions: The manuscript shows potential but requires minor polishing to enhance clarity and context. Authors are encouraged to address these revisions diligently, using reviewer comments as guidance.

Manuscript Considered after major revisions: Significant revisions are necessary for publication if the manuscript findings are sound. The author must address all the reviewer's comments carefully and provide a detailed response using the author's rebuttal form.

Revise and resubmit: In cases where a manuscript shows potential but requires substantial changes, this decision will be given. Once the authors have made the required changes, the manuscript will be reassessed in another round of scientific review.

Reject the manuscript: A total rejection will be advised for manuscripts with considerable scientific faults, lack of original contribution, and other reasons. In such circumstances, the manuscript will not be reconsidered for publication, regardless of the revisions made.

Reviewer Invitation Process

Prospective reviewers are kindly requested to carefully review the journal's Peer Review Policy prior to participation. Upon completing this step, eligible reviewers will receive an official Reviewer Invitation Letter to review submitted manuscripts. To proceed, please click here.

Apply to be a Reviewer

To apply as a peer reviewer, submit the following to ceo@kndi.institute:

A detailed CV highlighting research experience.
A list of published peer-reviewed journal articles.
A statement outlining your expertise and interest in reviewing for JND.

Peer Review Flow Chart

Sections— / 9